Powerful but risky - manage carefully! - Inaccuracy or Mislabeling - especially in ambiguous or nuanced contexts
- eg is the photo a protest or a festival?
- Bias Amplification - synthetic metadata trained with a bias is also biased
- Loss of Human Context - AI lacks cultural, emotions, situational awareness
- Privacy + Security - exposing sensitive information unintentionally
- Overdependence on Automation - who is accountable?
- Regulatory + Ethical - what is the compliance of synthetic metadata?
| Powerful but risky if used blindly. Big advantages, with technical, operational, ethical risks - Accuracy and Reliability - AI may misrepresent underlying data, leading to faulty results
- e.g. Hallucinations: create non-existent truths
- Bias Amplification - synthetic metadata bias can propagate or worsen
- Compliance + Legal - inaccurate lineage breaching GDPR, HIPAA, financial, licensing standards
- Security Vulnerabilities - Poisoning attacks: inject misleading metadata to manipulate outputs
- Quality Degradation - Cascade failures: poor metadata degrades downstream AI that generates poor data….
- Ethical + Transparency - Accountability gaps: who is responsible for mistakes — vendor, operator, or user.
- Operational & Maintenance - what generation of synthetic data poisoned the well?
| synthetic metadata introduces significant risks - Quality + Accuracy
- Error Propagation
- Hallucination
- Context Blindness (no nuance)
- Bias Amplification
- Self-Reinforcing
- Demographic Blindness
- Adversarial & Security
- Metadata Poisoning
- Gaming the System
- Supply Chain Attacks
- Reliability + Drift
- Model Degradation
- Circular Dependencies
- Brittleness
- Transparency + Accountability
- Black Box (AI documenting AI)
- Responsibility Diffusion
- Regulatory + Compliance
- Audit Trail (source of problem)
- Legal Liability (whose fault?)
- Standards Mismatch (AI fast, regulation slow)
|